Overall, the technical quality of each interview had come out very clear with little to no disturbance whatsoever, making each interview easier to understand. In terms of the meaning that it has on the overall recording it was to help get people's opinions across about music. The tone of voice helped to project the thoughts that the interviewees have. Because of this we were able to get a real sense of feeling as well as realism in our recordings, from each interviewee. The technical quality was really important to listeners mainly because, it helps with making sure that our messages are going across to our listeners.
MICROPHONES USED AND TECHNICAL ELEMENTS AS INFLUENCE.
The microphones that were used were from mobile devices, realistically in terms of equipment this would be a drawback, as it's obvious that some mobile microphones aren't as good as the official peripherals seeing as their not fully designed with quality in mind. However, due to our choice of location, being a small quiet room, there was a case of there being little to no noise whatsoever. The positive from this would be that as aforementioned there's less chance of there being too much disturbances or any ambiances that may have disrupted our recordings, luckily the room didn't have an echo either which helped with dialogue getting across in the interview. Making the technical quality balanced.
WHAT WE USED TO EDIT THE INTERVIEWS
As done previously we used GarageBand to edit our interviews, at first we split them up into three and put them all into a certain order with a soundscape to help start, the interview kick off, giving a nice effect that helps reel in our listeners. The editing process was mainly about making sure that each interview sounded clear, if not we'd have to record it again, as well as sounding more organised as well as consistent.
Our work:
You can find an edited version of the interview here:
No comments:
Post a Comment