Music:

By doing so it makes the scene as well as the documentary more intriguing to watch. Other examples of music contrast with other scenes where it could be argued that a motif is used to indicate a certain scene involving an encounter with drug dealers as such. In contrast to the dialogue as well as sound effects there are instances where the music sounds as if it's drowning other aspects of the score. Overall this could make the noise distorted.
SOUND EFFECTS:

In terms of non-diegetic sound is found throughout the entirety of the documentary, an example of this is, the meet up scenes (as aforementioned) especially the texting scenes, each time an animated graphic appears with the texts on screen we can hear little pings as well as typing noises, to emphasise activity between both people, as well as to emphasise and exaggerate realism with the drug dealer before they meet. Often examples of hyper real noises as their exaggerated by, using realistic noises to display an action or interaction that occurs. By doing this the documentary keeps it less boring, and more enjoyable to watch as the documentary isn't just giving us a static long shot, of Stacey standing there with background music which would deem to become boring as it's not very appealing for the audience to watch. Also by using this example of hyper realism the documentary also helps to dictate any form emotional realism overall, as it helps by giving us insight in what is going on with both a mix of visuals and sound effects to help that scene stand out in particular.
DIALOGUE/SPOKEN WORD:
Interview techniques: In interviews, both between the interviewer and interviewee, it's often clear to understand what's being said from Stacey as her accent is easy to understand and that she's loud and clear whereas, when it came to the interviewees, there are instances where there is an issue that nothing is being understood so in order to breach that gap between the audience and character the the documentary visually uses subtitles to help the audience understand what's being said, as there are some accents/dialects that may not be understood by the audience or the person is too quiet. A prominent example is around the 14:03 mark and further, the interviewees have a strong accent that is hard to understand, and with the use of a face mask it's harder to hear what's being said as in some instances they may seem quiet or the dialect is confusing, and strong. The Questions that is asked by Stacey helps us to further understand what's going on in the minds of these people as they're always asked deeper questions that get the people she speaks to for them to be open and honest, such as asking for views and their ages etc.
Voice Over:

CONCLUSION:
In conclusion, the sound mix used in this documentary in particular is a good example of how sound works all together to help produce a piece of media overall. Music is used to help set the theme and the setting for what the documentary overall has to offer to audiences giving them expectations. Sound effects allow for more exaggerated sound, more hyper realism and more so making the scene work,
No comments:
Post a Comment